This is the core of the certification.
Your task: Record yourself doing a live AEO diagnosis. On camera, with screen sharing and audio narration, do the following:
- Open any AI answer engine and submit your compound-job prompt.
- Read the AI answer. Narrate what you see: which brands are mentioned, which are cited, and what you notice about the answer's structure.
- Pick one winner and one loser from the answer. Navigate to the winner's website and explain what their page does well. Name the gate or gates they're passing and point to the specific elements on the page (the billboard, the answer blocks, the page architecture) that make the engine trust them.
- Navigate to the loser's website and explain what's failing. Name the gate that's broken and point to the specific structural problem on the page.
- Prescribe one fix for the loser. Be specific: what would the page look like after?
- Place the fix in the correct SAGE phase.
Record a single, unedited video, 5–8 minutes without slides or script. We accept links from Loom, YouTube (unlisted), Google Drive, Vimeo, or Dropbox. Make sure the link is publicly accessible or set to "anyone with the link can view." Face cam is recommended but optional.
The image below is a real Top Citation Pages view from Profound. You are looking at this data as HubSpot. The table is filtered to Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google AI Mode.
Each row shows: the page URL, its category (Other, Earned Media, Social), whether HubSpot is or is not mentioned on that page, the page's citation count with its recent change, and the page's share of total citations with its recent change. There are 988 total items in the full dataset. You are seeing the top results.
Take time to study this before you record. Save or screenshot the image so you can display it on your screen during recording.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kpjd3r-cGU94Wf6k8jPYjo-8eyYZ1bdj/view?usp=sharing
Your task: Record yourself reading this citation table on camera using the prescribed reading sequence from the course.
We want to hear you answer these questions, in order, as you move through the table:
- What are you looking at first, and why does the course say to start there?
- What does the mix of source types (the categories and domain types in the table) tell you about the citation supply chain for this topic?
- Where is HubSpot present and where is HubSpot absent? What does the pattern of "Mentioned" vs. "Not Mentioned" reveal when you cross-reference it with citation count and share?
- What's changing? Which pages are gaining or losing citation share, and what does that movement tell you about where the opportunity is headed?
- Based on everything you just read: what is your single most important next action? Be specific. What page would you build, what outreach would you do, what would you investigate next, and why does this data point you there?
Record a single, unedited screen recording, 2–4 minutes, with voiceover narration. Display the citation table on your screen. Same link requirements as Piece 1.
Your task: Read this scenario. Decide whether the colleague's recommendation is sound. If it's flawed, identify the specific conceptual error, explain why their logic breaks down even though parts of it seem right, and propose what you'd do instead using the frameworks from the course.
The Scenario
Your company sells HR software. You've been tracking AI answer visibility for three months. Your colleague pulls up the fan-out data and notices that when people ask about "employee onboarding software," the AI engines frequently transform the query to include words like "compliance," "checklist," and "document automation."
Your colleague proposes the following: "The data is telling us what the AI thinks onboarding means. We should build content pages targeting each of these transformed words. A page for 'onboarding compliance,' a page for 'onboarding checklists,' a page for 'document automation for new hires.' If the AI is expanding our topic into these words, we should have a page for each one. That's how we get retrieved."
Is this recommendation sound? If not, what specifically is wrong with it, and what would you recommend instead?
Write in your own voice. We're reading for clear thinking, not polished prose. Reference specific course concepts and terminology.